Miley Cyrus – ‘Hannah Montana’ – Baby Porn Star.
This is the little girl that millions of pre-teens adore.
To the ‘tween’ set, she is “Hannah Montana”
In this pose she appears as a seductive and supposedly naked (apart from a strategically placed sheet) woman.
And her parents approved of this pose?
Now tell me, seriously; would any parent in their right mind want to see their daughter like this?
And I can hear all the arguments from those who are not opposed to this picture.
“You see more flesh on the beach”
“You can’t see her boobies”
What you can see is an underage girl; a girl that is a role model for millions of young girls, posing in a provocative manner.
With parental approval.
Not so long ago, a fresh faced “Disney endorsed” little girl became a hit by being a little provocative.
And Mommy kept a close eye on her career.
And we all know how Britney’s life has become like watching a train wreck.
And let’s not forget where this poor little girl ended up after Mommy and Daddy kept a guiding eye on her career.
When are people going to get it?
You don’t sexualise little girls.
And as savvy as Miley may be; she is still a little girl.
A little girl that has a once famous mullet father, who is still semi in the limelight due to his daughter’s fame.
Parents who approve of their daughters being transformed into the stimuli for perves to jerk off to should be shot.
Yeah, that might sound over the top.
But it’s what I feel.
This shit makes me sick.
April 29, 2008 at 5:32 pm
Oh Dear. I can’t really think of an intelligent thing to say at the moment other than Oh dear..
I feel a bit ill..
April 29, 2008 at 5:49 pm
I so agree !!!!!!
Jail bait. I don’t get why parents allow this !!!!
April 29, 2008 at 6:37 pm
I couldn’t agree more – how did her parents ever approve !
April 29, 2008 at 7:11 pm
Did you see the other photos on the news? Where Miley is posed WITH HER DAD, looking very much like lovers?? Not at all like father and daughter. That’s so wrong and I don’t believe he didn’t know this. Obviously it’s all about the money.
April 29, 2008 at 8:58 pm
[...] Miley Cyrus – ‘Hannah Montana’ – Baby Porn Star. [...]
April 29, 2008 at 9:09 pm
She is a child. Her father should have been protecting her. He didn’t. The end.
April 29, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Prety scary shit isn’t it?
April 29, 2008 at 11:47 pm
It is scary, but whats scarier for me is that Hannah Montana is one of my daughter’s favourite shows. Looks like we will be looking for a new show.
There is no way that anyone could think that a photo like that is not sexual.
And if you’re going over the top Anja, I’m coming with you
April 30, 2008 at 12:05 am
Apparently the shots were taken AFTER her parents left the set and were waiting for her to change. She was talked into it WITHOUT parental approval.
Still a bit strange.
April 30, 2008 at 1:54 am
Porn is alway good.
April 30, 2008 at 8:02 am
FPR: I can understand that response. It is sickening.
WS: Parents like Billy the fucking mullet and other stage parents just love to bask in the glow of their children’s fame.
Babyamore: Miley has become Billy Ray’s cash cow. He must be loving this controversy.
River: Oh yeah, that one’s a bit cringeworthy.
Kelley: He’s been selling her for years. Bastard.
Anonymum: Very scary shit. There’s a really fine line between art and porn. And when an underage girl is involved it is really scary.
Gemisht: Yeah, what does a parent do about this? Kids love Miley’s show; kids think she’s wonderful. Now the parents are put in a shitful position of trying to explain why “Hannah” is posing like she’s just earned $100 flat on her back. There is no freakin’ way that picture is anything but sexual.
Veronica: This is a difficult one. There have been varied reports about whether the parents were there or not. But you would think the parents would have seen ALL THE PICS that were going to be in Vanity Fair. That still went ahead. I’m very sceptical about the parents doing the whole “we didn’t know” rubbish.
Pstrong: Dipshit.
April 30, 2008 at 10:40 am
I agree with river. That other pose with her dad looked gross. According to the news over here the whole family saw the pics before they were released and they said they were fine.
ick.
April 30, 2008 at 11:46 am
I agree with you whole-heartedly. It wouldn’t matter if she were wearing a black turtleneck and jeans, the pose still oozes sex. The fact aside that she is a role model for young girls, is that she is being robbed of her own innocence too. It is sickening.
WC
April 30, 2008 at 12:50 pm
They are from Kentucky if that tells you anything.
April 30, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
May 1, 2008 at 7:45 am
This is bad enough – no really it’s almost as sick as it gets putting the porn look in a 15 yo in mainstream mags as if it is normal. But the one with her dad as well….. eeeeuuuuuuw! Seriously, it looks like an ad for incest. Talk about getting back in the limelight on the coattails of your daughter.
May 1, 2008 at 7:59 am
Queenbitch: That’s such a close family. Way too close.
Writerchick: Yes, you’re so right. It’s really rather sad.
Evyl: Is there a lot of banjo playing in Kentucky?
Imnomartha: And the sickening thing is Billy Ray himself. He is using his daughter as some sort of springboard to re-launch is own dead career.
May 1, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Sick and screwed up; with a father like that the poor kid has no hope
June 28, 2008 at 7:53 am
Well, I see either another Britney Spears or she can do porn. Her and her dad look like lovers in these photographs. Miley can’t sing anyway, so I think she is gonna become another sad hollywood story. Oh well, she’s just another chapter in the Book of Hollywood.
November 20, 2008 at 8:48 am
This is not child porn, now if there was exposed breast i would understand. I have seen girls MUCH younger wearing bikinis that are more revealing. Miley is beautiful and this is art, some people dont understand that, such as the majority of you.
Gebus Trevor, get a grip. Yep, ’tis porn. When underage girls are striking a pose that suggests they just copped a twat full of cock, ’tis porn. Miley is beautiful? Um… that’s debatable. Here’s a tip for you, Trev. it’s not art. It’s exploitation, although it has skyrocketed the career of another ho-hum singer. Art, I understand art. Shit that’s designed to rise a woody, that’s what Miley did.